Archive


Category: non-Hodgkin lymphoma

  • ASH: Trial backs Gilead’s Yescarta CAR-T in first-line lymphoma

    Gilead Sciences has taken a big step towards positioning its CAR-T therapy Yescarta as an option for previously-untreated large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) with updated results from the ZUMA-12 trial at the ASH congress this week. The phase 2 trial showed that 78% of high-risk LBCL patients treated first-line with Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel) had a […]

  • ASH: Gilead, BMS CAR-Ts square off in relapsed lymphoma

    A pair of trials have suggested that CAR-T therapies could offer an improved option for patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) who have relapsed after or haven’t responded to first-line treatment. The results of the ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM trials, reported at the American Society of Haematology (ASH) congress, could see Gilead Sciences’ Yescarta (axicabtagene […]

  • ASH abstract drop backs Roche’s Polivy in first-line lymphoma

    Roche trumpeted a top-line results of the POLARIX trial of its Polivy therapy in previously-untreated B-cell lymphoma, and a first look at the data suggests it is on track for approval in what could be a highly lucrative new market. An abstract of the results published ahead of the upcoming American Society of Haematology (ASH) […]

  • Incyte, MorphoSys’ CAR-T rival tafasitamab approved in EU

    Incyte and MorphoSys’ antibody therapy tafasitamab has been approved in Europe, promising to provide a more convenient alternative to expensive and cumbersome CAR-T therapies for patients with certain types of lymphoma. The European Commission has approved tafasitamab in combination with Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Revlimid (lenalidomide), followed by the antibody on its own, for the treatment of […]

  • Novartis’ bid to extend Kymriah into earlier use hits a roadblock

    Novartis’ CAR-T therapy Kymriah racked up back-to-back approvals in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and large B-cell lymphoma a few years ago, but hasn’t added to its label since. Now, a bid to move it onto earlier-stage use in lymphoma has ended in failure. In the phase 3 BELINDA trial, Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) was unable to extend event-free […]

  • Armed with ph3 trial, Roche preps filing for Polivy in first-line DLBCL

    Roche has the results it was hoping for in a phase 3 trial of Polivy in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) – an indication it thinks could be worth up to $2 billion. The Swiss drugmaker reported top-line results from the POLARIX study this morning, showing that Polivy (polatuzumab vedotin) was able to […]

  • BMS will file for earlier-line use of Breyanzi in lymphoma after trial win

    Bristol-Myer Squibb has only just won FDA approval for its CAR-T Breyanzi in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), but is already eyeing an expansion into earlier-line therapy that could overtake rival therapies from Novartis and Gilead Sciences. Breyanzi (lisocabtagene maraleucel or liso-cel) was approved in February for use in LBCL patients after two prior systemic therapies, […]

  • BMS finally gets FDA OK for liso-cel, sets $410k launch price

    Bristol-Myers Squibb finally has FDA approval for its CAR-T therapy liso-cel, which has been cleared by the US regulator as Breyanzi for certain forms of large B-cell lymphoma. The green light comes too late for holders of the contingent value right (CVR) BMS offered as a sweetener to its takeover of Celgene, which lapsed because […]

  • ASH: Lilly builds case for its BTK drug LOXO-305 in lymphoma

    Eli Lilly’s buyout of Loxo Oncology last year has already yielded one approved drug, and it now has a path to market for a second after BTK inhibitor LOXO-305 after reporting promising data at the American Society of Haematology (ASH) meeting. Updated results from the phase 1/2 BRUIN trial suggest that LOXO-305 could become a […]

  • FDA sets May date for verdict on ADC’s lymphoma drug Lonca

    ADC Therapeutics could claim its first product approval in the US next May, after the FDA started a priority review of lead drug Lonca for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Lonca – short for loncastuximab tesirine (formerly ADCT-402) – is an antibody-drug conjugate that combines an antibody against CD19 […]

  • Merck & Co buys cancer biotech VelosBio for $2.75bn

    Merck & Co has agreed to buy California biotech VelosBio and its experimental cancer drug for $2.75 billion in cash. Known as MSD outside North America, the big pharma already has a firm foothold in cancer thanks to its immunotherapy Keytruda (pembrolizumab), which has been on the market for several years and has proven to […]

  • NICE recommends regular NHS funding for Roche’s lymphoma drug Polivy

    NICE has recommended regular NHS funding for Roche’s Polivy in certain lymphoma patients in final draft guidance, overturning a previous rejection. The new guidance recommends Polivy (polatuzumab vedotin) in combination with rituximab and bendamustine, for adults with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), in second line when patients cannot have a stem cell transplant. Around 4,800 […]

  • FDA to decide on TG Therapeutics’ lymphoma drug early next year

    The FDA has accepted TG Therapeutics’ filing for its lymphoma drug umbralisib, which if approved could compete against a combination therapy from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Roche. TG’s filing covers previously treated marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and follicular lymphoma (FL), competing against a combination of BMS’ Revlimid (lenalidomide) and Roche’s Rituxan (rituximab), known for short as […]

  • Incyte/Morphosys take on CAR-Ts as lymphoma antibody Monjuvi approved in US

    Incyte and Morphosys’ Monjuvi antibody therapy has been approved for certain patients with lymphoma, as the companies hope to provide a more convenient alternative to expensive and cumbersome CAR-T therapy. At the beginning of the year Incyte paid $750m to Morphosys for the CD-19 targeting antibody, which has been approved in combination with BMS’ Revlimid […]

  • Does Aspartame Cause Lymphoma?

    The approval of aspartame has a controversial history. The Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concluded that “there is a reasonable certainty that human consumption of aspartame: (1) …will not pose a risk of brain damage resulting in mental retardation, endocrine [hormonal] dysfunction, or both; and (2) will not cause brain tumors.” […]